|
| <novalogic> | I'd like to welcome you all to the Stampede devel team forum | 20:56 |
| <skibum> | Here we go |
| <weez> | wanna start by explaining just what Stampede is? |
| <novalogic> | Before we get started |
| I'll explain what it is :) |
| <skibum> | go for it |
| <novalogic> | Well |
| really |
| I'll paste from the web page |
| :) | 20:57 |
| <|> | Stampede Linux is an innovative, new approach to Linux distributions. |
| We wanted a distribution that was fast, easy for the new user, and |
| "awesome" for the power user. So, we decided to create Stampede. |
| <skibum> | Probably |
| doh ... that was supposed to be a /msg :) |
| <Rawb> | How long is this going to last? |
| <novalogic> | Rawb; as long as you guys want | 20:58 |
| <weez> | Rawb: not sure, when the questions are done? =) |
| <novalogic> | Now, the questions... |
| <Questions> | BOredAtWork asks, What about the legal mess? Has anybody sent a response to Stampede Technologies yet? Any reply? |
| <Gerwain> | ok when do the questions start |
| oh |
| <skibum> | I'll field this one |
| <Gerwain> | skibum is the only one who knows about the legal mess |
| <skibum> | We drafted a response letter to Stampede Technologies, and sent it to them about 2 weeks ago | 20:59 |
| We haven't heard anything since |
| <Questions> | Ex-Cyber asks, any word on how far development of the new installer has come? |
| <skibum> | Gerwain will get this one |
| <Gerwain> | well |
| lemme check | 21:00 |
| im writing a reusable (to me at least) widgets library along with it |
| i've ran into a lot of problems in that area, so the actual installer goes on hold too | 21:01 |
| its not as far along as id like it to be |
| <Questions> | eh asks, will Stampede ever go to platforms other than x86? |
| <Gerwain> | maybe... Minotaur was working on an alpha port... |
| <RawbX2> | Actually, a Alpha port has alredy begun. | 21:02 |
| <skibum> | We currently have a port-in-progress for the Alpha |
| <Minotaur> | An Alpha port is currently in progress. |
| <Questions> | T0ny asks, Has/Is anybody planning to release Stampede on CD-ROM? |
| <skibum> | and PPC is nearly ready to roll out |
| around 1.0, we will release CD's via standard distribution channels |
| <Minotaur> | We have established the first few core packages, and hope to release the first useable, at least useable for further development, version by .90. |
| <skibum> | right now, you can buy gold cd's |
| <Questions> | real0r asks, i want to know how distribution is going...how many people will recieve/hear about Stampede and how? | 21:03 |
| <skibum> | email discobob@beer.stampede.org for more info |
| <novalogic> | for those of you who dont know, http://www.stampede.org is the Stampede home page. |
| <skibum> | The distribution is going very smothly |
| People currently hear about Stampede only via news sites like slashdot, and word of mouth | 21:04 |
| <RawbX2> | I think the Linux Journal article brought Stampede Linux to a lot of people, who didn't know about it before, also, places like SLASHDOT and freshmeat have given us a lot of press |
| <Gerwain> | we're doing just peachy |
| <Questions> | eh asks, is the installer as complete as, say the SuSE installer? if not, will it ever be? |
| <skibum> | And I suppose recently, Linux Journal |
| not yet, but it definitly will be |
| <RawbX2> | Currently the installer is not as complete as the SuSE installer, but Gerwain is quickly working on that. |
| <Questions> | weez asks, Stampede boasts to be 10-30% than other distro's, how does Stampede achive this? |
| <Gerwain> | pgcc | 21:05 |
| no debugging |
| <skibum> | Aggresive optimization and lack of debugging symbols |
| <RawbX2> | Using pgcc, without any debugging, and by pushing it to higher optimization levels. |
| <Questions> | whee asks, are the programs bundled with stampede fairly recent, or suprisingly old ones like some other dists? | 21:06 |
| <Minotaur> | As much as possible, the most recent stable releases of software is being used. |
| <skibum> | That is something very interesting about Stampede |
| <RawbX2> | We try and find the most recent stable release of any piece of software availible. | 21:07 |
| <Gerwain> | depends on when you got your copy of stampede -- the ones on the ftp site are recent |
| <skibum> | It definitly has more up-to-date packages than any other distribution I know of |
| AfterStep is the one exception, |
| which is still packaged at version 1.0 |
| (this will be resolved soon) |
| <Questions> | weez asks, how many developers are involved with stampede? | 21:08 |
| <skibum> | That depends on how you define packages |
| rather developers |
| If you define a developer as someone who makes packages |
| then we've got around 20 or so |
| <Questions> | eh asks, is Stampede going to be GPL based like Debian, or will it be like other distributions and include some commercial demos? | 21:09 |
| <Minotaur> | One of the best things about Stampede, in my opinion, is anyone is a developer. If you want to compile something, and contribute it to the project, it is graciously accepted. |
| <Gerwain> | if there is something good out there, we'll include it |
| <skibum> | It may include some commercial demos, but will always be as free to redistribute as debian. I don't forsee us putting any per-user / per-machine lisenced software in the distribution | 21:10 |
| <RawbX2> | If we can redistribute it, and it's worth something to us, we probably include it in the distro. |
| <Questions> | BOredAtWork asks, When will a stampede CD image be available? How about cheapbytes, lsl, linux central, etc, selling CD's? Can we expect to see it soon? |
| <skibum> | Linux International will be selling CD's soon | 21:11 |
| <RawbX2> | A couple of places have said that they will be selling stampede CD's when Stampede reaches version 1.0 |
| <skibum> | I assume the others will definitly be selling 1.0 cd's |
| <Gerwain> | the image will be avaliable when we finish it |
| <Questions> | weez asks, is there an estimated time that 1.0 will be available? |
| <Gerwain> | when we finish it | 21:12 |
| <skibum> | I hope by the end of the year |
| <Questions> | Ex-Cyber asks, Has anyone complained/flamed regarding the exploits package? Is this a major concern for you? |
| <RawbX2> | (Probably sooner) |
| <skibum> | I haven't heard anything yet |
| <Questions> | sn0rk asks, how many megs to download the complete distro? | 21:13 |
| <skibum> | 210M right now |
| <Questions> | gcc asks, does stampede support UMSDOS install (like in slack) and does it support fat32? |
| <Gerwain> | no UMSDOS install right now |
| <Minotaur> | fat32 Support is in place... |
| <RawbX2> | Currently no UMSDOS support, but we do have fat32 built into the bootdisks. |
| <skibum> | No, it doesn't (an probably never will) do UMSDOS, however Fat32 works right now | 21:14 |
| <Gerwain> | and i dont really care to write it, but you never know |
| <Questions> | eh asks, Have you ever thought of making a LIVE version of Stampede for those who don't want to take the complete Linux plunge? |
| <skibum> | Yes |
| I am hoping to have that by version 1.0 |
| <RawbX2> | Probably will happen in the 1.0 version... |
| <skibum> | s/I/we |
| <Questions> | weez asks, How stable would you say Stampede is at this point? |
| <RawbX2> | It still has a few small bugs, but overall it's as stable as linux is supposed to be. | 21:15 |
| <Questions> | drendite asks, How much of an improvement is pgcc over standard egcs? |
| <skibum> | At least as stable as Debian and Redhat, perhaps more so. (The biggest argument I have in our favour is that debian and redhat have glibc-2.0.7 <experimental> and we use glibc-2.0.6<stable>) | 21:16 |
| About 5-15% |
| depending on the nature of the program | 21:17 |
| <Questions> | gcc asks, can i use a slackware root/boot disk with stampede (like may be both disks slackware, or root disk slackware, boot disk stampede, or vice versa)? |
| <RawbX2> | You can use a slackware boot disk with the stampede root disk... |
| (which is handy, until we modularize our bootdisks) |
| <Questions> | drendite asks, What style of Init does Stampede use? (bsd or sysV) | 21:18 |
| <skibum> | A hybrid |
| <RawbX2> | BSD mostly, with SysV support. |
| <skibum> | It is mostly BSD in style, but is 100% sysv compatible |
| <Questions> | eh asks, Will stampede support other packaging formats, such as RPM, DEB, tgz, etc.? |
| <skibum> | Stampede already supports RPM |
| <Gerwain> | if you download the alien package it will. | 21:19 |
| <skibum> | Deb is on the horizon |
| <Gerwain> | :) |
| <RawbX2> | tgz you can't really not support. |
| <skibum> | tgz is still up in the air |
| <Questions> | joyce asks, are there plans to support non-Pentium/Intel distributions? |
| <RawbX2> | We actually had 0.79 for i386... but the maintainer has not done any work on the 0.86 release. | 21:20 |
| <Questions> | Ex-Cyber asks, Have you considered expanding the SLP format to include flags for alpha/beta/stable releases of packages, and a flag for those that have not been stripped because of the need for debugging (e.g. wine) | 21:21 |
| <skibum> | Yes |
| Alpha is close |
| PPC and sparc to come soon after |
| Already included |
| <RawbX2> | the SLP format already has those tags. |
| <Gerwain> | yep already there |
| <Questions> | nadman asks, Is there any advantage to using Stampede/PPC over, say, PPC Linux? The reason I am asking is because the 10-30% improvement you get with PGCC won't really work with the PPC chips. | 21:22 |
| <skibum> | Indeed it won't. However, there is lots more to Stampede than pgcc | 21:23 |
| <Minotaur> | There are going to be many more benefits to Stampede-Linux than merely the speed boost. |
| <skibum> | For instance: |
| The portable SLP format |
| <Minotaur> | A big benefit is merely the stability of the overall system |
| <skibum> | Up-to-date packages |
| <RawbX2> | If you like how Stampede does things (updated packages), then there are good reasons for PPC... |
| <skibum> | ease of installation |
| <Questions> | bum asks, how far along is the stampede packager | 21:24 |
| <skibum> | stability |
| And nice developers :) |
| (arrogant developers?) |
| <Minotaur> | Eh, available on the IRC server often... |
| <skibum> | The package format in inteself is probably in it's second to last mutation |
| The package tools are about 50% there | 21:25 |
| The package management system is just begining |
| <Questions> | OctobrX asks, I know I'm a late comer to this... But what is the default WindowManager for Stampede? |
| <skibum> | No default |
| <RawbX2> | Hmm.. I think right now twm is default if you don't change anything.... | 21:26 |
| <skibum> | I've almost got the window manager selection tool done |
| <Questions> | eh asks, does stampede use stable kernels? |
| <RawbX2> | Yup. and there is a contrib package for the development kernel. |
| <skibum> | So, when you type startx, you are presented with a list to choose from, generated from currently installed packages | 21:27 |
| <Questions> | drendite asks, Does pgcc include optimizations for Cyrix, K6, Pentium 2, etc.. ? |
| <skibum> | YEs |
| Pgcc has pentium, pentiumpro, and pentium2 <this is new> optimizations |
| <Questions> | Ex-Cyber asks, are any revisions of the directory structure of the distribution planned? currently alpha and beta software is mixed in with stable... | 21:28 |
| <skibum> | clones like the K6 / K6/2 will see a definite improvement with pentium optimization |
| That's still up in the air |
| <RawbX2> | Sometimes, you will come across a beta product that is much more stable than the other tools availible, if it seems pretty sturdy, we'll probably include it. | 21:29 |
| <Minotaur> | WindowMaker, for example. 6.5, I think, is still the "stable" version, while 16.1 is equally stable, and much more complete. |
| <Questions> | OctobrX asks, Hmmm... I take it stampede will be geared more towards those that are "in the know" as opposed to Non-technical types like myself? I personaly run Linux for its GUI capabilities.. was probably the first non-hacker to run Linux (still have no clue what I'm doing) :) However, if you typeing ./configure ; make ; make install doesn't fix my problems, I normally don't bother with it... should I still try Stampede? | 21:30 |
| <Minotaur> | A big thing with Stampede is giving the end user plenty of options. Include the stable version, throw in the devel version as an option, let the user decide for themselves. |
| <skibum> | OctobrX: absolutly at version 1.0 |
| it should be very easy to use | 21:31 |
| <Questions> | joyce asks, how hard is stampede to install? red hat takes me two disks and twenty minutes (well, in theory. =) ) can stampede beat that? |
| <skibum> | for now, it's kindof a tossup |
| Stampede is about equivalent to an install of slackware right now (in ease) |
| And the speed varies greatly by many factors |
| <RawbX2> | (I.E. NFS over the internet is butt slow...) | 21:32 |
| <skibum> | so while I can install on my Dual pentium II in about 10 minutes, you may not be able to :) |
| <Questions> | weez asks, one of the biggest problems suffered by newcomers, is the comlicantacy of setting up post-install features. i.e: printer, ppp, etc... how does stampede handle this? |
| * skibum | wishes he really had a Dual Pentium II |
| <skibum> | Questions: By easy to use configuration tools (version 1.0) | 21:33 |
| s/questions/weez/ |
| Right now, it's about the same as trying to set up ppp/printer/blah in slackware |
| <RawbX2> | I think the printer is still one of the most difficult beasts to tame (in Linux) ... just barely beating INNd in setup difficulty... |
| <Questions> | joyce asks, how is ISDN and ADSL support under stampede? |
| <skibum> | not really sure | 21:34 |
| Minotaur may be able to give you a report |
| however every one else has a 33.6 |
| :) |
| <Questions> | dabman asks, you sure pgcc supports PII ?! |
| <RawbX2> | We do include dhcp, which is needed for many DSL providers. |
| <skibum> | yes |
| <discobob> | Stampede is running on the PII next to me... | 21:35 |
| <Questions> | eh asks, will Stampede come with the software needed to setup a cluster, or will we have to go to Extreme Linux? |
| <skibum> | Definitly sometime in the future, possibly (50/50) by 1.0 |
| <Questions> | drendite asks, Are any WindowMangers included other than twm? | 21:36 |
| <Minotaur> | For the record, I should clarify an earlier comment of mine. I was corrected in that the current version of WindowMaker is now 17.5, and not 16.1 as I earlier stated. | 21:37 |
| <skibum> | WindowMaker, Afterstep, twm, KDE, Gnome, Blackbox |
| <discobob> | KDE, Gnome, WindowMaker, Afterstep, E, BlackBox... |
| <skibum> | E |
| <discobob> | fvwm |
| <skibum> | fvwm2 |
| <Questions> | novalogic asks, programs such as irc clients and other things use GNU ./configure scripts to set them selfs up, how well do they work, do you have to modify them at all to compile those things? | 21:38 |
| <skibum> | They work great | 21:39 |
| something that amazes me about stampede and configure scripts is: |
| checking for *** .. yes |
| is something you will generally see |
| <weez> | op skibum_ | 21:40 |
| <Questions> | weez asks, is Stampede development a totally volunteer based operation? |
| <weez> | oops |
| <discobob> | yes |
| <Gerwain> | yes it is totally volunteer |
| <skibum> | 100% |
| <Gerwain> | discobob runs a sweatshop though... |
| <skibum> | haha |
| <discobob> | Gerwain! |
| <Questions> | eh asks, will Stampede come with the Corel demos (eg: Word Perfect 7)? | 21:41 |
| <discobob> | Now Kathy Lee's gonna be pissed at me! |
| <skibum> | That depends on the licensing |
| I'll have to read it carefully before I can give you a yes/no |
| <Questions> | gandalf asks, does stampede have an "advanced user" aura with such distributions as slackware? I mean, what are the differences between slack and stampede? I'm looking for something as customizable and advanced as slackware without such idiotic decisions as egcs 1.0x with a 2.0.x kernel... | 21:42 |
| <skibum> | Stampede definitly has the "advanced user" aura. |
| <RawbX2> | It's probably the closest related to slackware (well... with glibc and pgcc) |
| <skibum> | The differences betweek slackware and stampede are huge though |
| I disagree with rawb, | 21:43 |
| Slackware and stampede aren't really alike |
| other than the default color ls :) |
| <discobob> | installing/removing programs is a lot easier. |
| <Questions> | drendite asks, What IRC Clients does Stampede include? Does it include cutting-edge clients such as EPIC? (: | 21:44 |
| <skibum> | BitchX, Epic, and tkirc are the only ones included right now |
| <RawbX2> | and yagIRC |
| <skibum> | oh yeah |
| <Questions> | novalogic asks, What kind of userbase uses Stampede right now, do you have any numbers on that? |
| <discobob> | none at all | 21:45 |
| <skibum> | err something |
| <RawbX2> | Don't really have a definite number.... |
| <skibum> | My estimiation is in the tens of thousands |
| juding my amount of downloads |
| <discobob> | nay, millions! |
| <Questions> | gandalf asks, what is the projected size for a full installation of stampede - and is there somewhere where I can find a package list of what/what isn't included? |
| <skibum> | he's a tad eccentric, excuse him |
| <RawbX2> | http://stampede.gdiweb.com .. has a complete listing, with a search feature. | 21:46 |
| <skibum> | A full installation will never be recommended, but it'll probably be upwards of 1.2 gig |
| stampede.gdiweb.com is still a tad out of date though | 21:47 |
| <Questions> | weez asks, does the slp packager handle dependency's? |
| <skibum> | not yet |
| that's the next obsticle, I project a 2 week delivery on slp tools that do |
| <Questions> | gandalf asks, is stampede currently distributed on media such as cd etc, and will it ever be offered by cheapbytes etc? | 21:48 |
| <skibum> | absolutly |
| we sell gold cd's now (for $10) |
| <weez> | gold? |
| as in, the color of the cd? |
| <discobob> | CD-R |
| <weez> | =) |
| <Questions> | eh asks, will Stampede ever be as complete as the SuSE Install, package wise? (All packages over the 3 have choices in the installer) |
| <skibum> | and cheapbytes/lsl/li have expressed intrest in distributing Cds at 1.0 |
| I hope so | 21:49 |
| <weez> | would you guys like to open this place up for un-moderated discussion now? |